Difference between revisions of "Dic:multitude"
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
|valign="top"| | |valign="top"| | ||
<!--en--> | <!--en--> | ||
| − | '''Multitude''' is a term for a group of people that is not bound by a social contract with a sovereign entity, such that ''' | + | '''Multitude''' is a term for a group of people and entities that is not bound by a social contract with a sovereign entity, such that its '''individual''' participants retain their''' self-determination''' capacity. If those boundless and/or authoritatives individuals can participate to cooperations and multi-stakeholder processes on a theorical '''equal footing basis''', they therefore neither form a people, a crowd, nor a community: they belong to the "multitude". |
<!--/en--> | <!--/en--> | ||
|} | |} | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
|valign="top"| | |valign="top"| | ||
<!--en--> | <!--en--> | ||
| + | The power of the multitude's dynamic coalitions ('''potentia''') is the limit and incitation to innovation and development of stable sovereign powers ('''potestas'''). Societal adaptation to technological evolution and paradigmatic transitions result from their mutual "self-ordering criticality" (SOC), where multitude looks for a '''survival progress''' and/or '''adaptation''', and sovereignty implies a '''protecting order''' and '''stability'''. | ||
| + | <!--/en--> | ||
| + | |} | ||
| + | {| | ||
| + | |width="600"| | ||
| + | |width="50"| | ||
| + | |width="600"| | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |valign="top"| | ||
| + | <!--fr--> | ||
| + | <!--/fr--> | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | |valign="top"| | ||
| + | <!--en--> | ||
| + | One does not lead the multitude, but one can build an environment that will influence its polycratic (decisions by common emergence) inflection toward common evolutions and new self-orders that may use or avoid critical phases. | ||
<!--/en--> | <!--/en--> | ||
|} | |} | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
{{banner}} | {{banner}} | ||
Revision as of 09:37, 28 April 2014
|
Multitude is a term for a group of people and entities that is not bound by a social contract with a sovereign entity, such that its individual participants retain their self-determination capacity. If those boundless and/or authoritatives individuals can participate to cooperations and multi-stakeholder processes on a theorical equal footing basis, they therefore neither form a people, a crowd, nor a community: they belong to the "multitude". |
|
The power of the multitude's dynamic coalitions (potentia) is the limit and incitation to innovation and development of stable sovereign powers (potestas). Societal adaptation to technological evolution and paradigmatic transitions result from their mutual "self-ordering criticality" (SOC), where multitude looks for a survival progress and/or adaptation, and sovereignty implies a protecting order and stability. |
|
One does not lead the multitude, but one can build an environment that will influence its polycratic (decisions by common emergence) inflection toward common evolutions and new self-orders that may use or avoid critical phases. |
"par la Multitude pour la Multitude" - "by the Multitude for the Multitude"
|
Cette page ouverte aux contributions spécialisées. Inscrivez vous sur la liste agora@dnsa.org. Vous pourrez être coopté comme coauteur-mainteneur de ce site et contribuer à cette page. |
This page is open to specialized contributions. Please subscrible to the agora@dnsa.org mailing list. We will then be able to be coopted as co-author-maintainer of this site and to contributed to this page. |
